Contact us

Questions about your strategic brand development? 
Get expert advice from Louis-Philip Cattoir, IP &amp; Brand Strategist at Remarkable Europe.

Let’s talk about your challenge

Neem contact op

Vragen over jouw strategische merkontwikkeling? 
Krijg advies van Louis-Philip Cattoir, IP &amp; Merkstrateeg bij Remarkable Europe.

Laten we jouw uitdaging bespreken

Contact

Schrijf je in voor onze maandelijkse nieuwsbrief!

Thank you!

Bedankt!

Looking for more strategic, creative, and legal brand insights?

Wil je meer strategische, creatieve en juridische merkinzichten ontvangen?

Footer Bottom Menu

Footer Bottom Menu NL

Footer Menu EN

Footer Menu NL

Header Menu EN

Header Menu NL

As fries are to Belgium, Phở is to Vietnam—a national dish so iconic that UNESCO is considering it for cultural heritage status. But beyond the steaming bowls of noodle soup, Pho is also the name of a British restaurant chain that built its success on serving this dish. 
Founded in 2005 after a trip to Vietnam, the restaurant’s founders introduced Phở to the UK market when the name and dish were still relatively unknown. This allowed them to register “Pho” as a trademark, giving them exclusive rights to the name for their business.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-4349" src="https://admin.remarkable.eu/content/uploads/2025/02/pho-law-e1740047471767.jpg" alt="Pho registered" width="434" height="464" />

The power of a name: From dish to brand

Recently, a TikTok video by @iamyenlikethemoney reignited controversy over the restaurant’s monopoly on the name. Critics argue that their trademark limits smaller Vietnamese restaurants from using a name that describes their own cuisine while also profiting from cultural appropriation.
A trademark grants exclusivity, but that exclusivity must have limits. If a name is too generic, it cannot serve as a brand identifier, nor should it block competitors from using common industry terms. This is why trademark offices assess distinctiveness—but policies vary across countries, and historical registrations often slip through despite stricter modern rules.

Trademark or trade barrier?

In 2013, Pho took legal action against Mo Pho Viet Café, claiming the name could be used for a dish but not as a business name. However, backlash led them to drop the case and eventually revise their trademark policies.
This case shows that public pressure can challenge trademark monopolies, even without formal legal action. The backlash eventually led Pho to withdraw their trademark, freeing the name for public use once again.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-4348" src="https://admin.remarkable.eu/content/uploads/2025/02/apology-e1740047562411.png" alt="apology" width="490" height="546" />

The fine line between brand and generic name

Is your brand name at risk?
Using generic terms, culturally significant words, or foreign-language names as trademarks carries risk. The public perception of a brand can make or break its legal standing—as seen in this case.
Think your brand name might be too generic? <a href="https://remarkable.eu/en/contact/">Let’s find out together.</a>

Pho or Faux? When a name becomes a monopoly